Prediction for Last Week of May - Sessions

Only two sessions submitted this time. One is here:

http://www.fileden.com/files/2011/4/3/3108448//37190211 (1).pdf

...and the other was sent by email:

- An accident, a fire in a place called, it sounded like “Tent” in England. It somehow as nuclear implications.
- Food rationing, each person only as the right to certain amount of food.
- An ex-convict that chases a women that lives in a trailer.
- A Truck that is involved in an accident.

- - - - - - - - -

Both sessions correlate with the impression of some kind of transport vehicle being involved in an accident. In Nasence's session she is unsure of the nature of this vehicle, and draws an airplane plummeting nose down. She also mentions a group of men (a team) who are celebrating the achievement of some goal.

Prediction:

In the last week of May (24-31) there will be a large and international newsworthy accident involving a transportation vehicle.

Secondary prediction:

This accident will involve a specific group of men; a 'team' or a group of some sort.

Prediction for end of May 2011

3719 0211

Sessions in before May 14th please to marv.darley@gmail.com.

We are attempting to predict an event in the last week of this month.

Happy viewing!

AOLing Scheduled Major News Events

I have had several of the viewers that took part here suggesting that perhaps the task here had been muddied by the blanket news coverage of the Royal wedding on Saturday, that perhaps the person responsible for choosing the eventual feedback might have been 'thinking' about the wedding etc when he/she tasked the US Tornadoes.

To clear this up:

1) Although this does constitute mild front-loading (unavoidable though, to clear this up) rest assured that I will never accept a tasking that retrospectively tasks viewers to describe an event that is pre-scheduled in any way (as the Royal wedding clearly was).

Unforeseen events may and do often occur around such events, but they will never constitute a tasking simply by virtue of their pre-planned importance.

2) Suggesting that a tasker may have had this or that 'on their mind' when tasking is a singularly bad thing to do when analysing one's session data in light of feedback. Not only does this lower one's self expectations for future sessions but it also makes a mockery of the strict protocol on which remote viewing is based.

There is ONE target; the one provided to you as feedback. Viewers should resist the urge to validate their session data by looking for other ways to 'explain' the data in their sessions.