Prediction for last week of June

Well it looks like we have a concurrence with two sessions both describing an explosion of sorts with life forms involved. Session 1 indicates that two people in a building with stucco walls will be obliterated whilst Session 2 continues this theme of an explosive act with consequences.

I am having trouble linking the actual sessions for now but allow me to issue this prediction:

The last seven days of June will see the elimination of a notable world figure via a guided explosive device.

Predictive Target no.4

4171 0212

Sessions due in by June 14th.

FEEDBACK for 3719 0211:

Suspension of FIFA official Bin Hammam / description of event

Prediction for Last Week of May - Sessions

Only two sessions submitted this time. One is here:

http://www.fileden.com/files/2011/4/3/3108448//37190211 (1).pdf

...and the other was sent by email:

- An accident, a fire in a place called, it sounded like “Tent” in England. It somehow as nuclear implications.
- Food rationing, each person only as the right to certain amount of food.
- An ex-convict that chases a women that lives in a trailer.
- A Truck that is involved in an accident.

- - - - - - - - -

Both sessions correlate with the impression of some kind of transport vehicle being involved in an accident. In Nasence's session she is unsure of the nature of this vehicle, and draws an airplane plummeting nose down. She also mentions a group of men (a team) who are celebrating the achievement of some goal.

Prediction:

In the last week of May (24-31) there will be a large and international newsworthy accident involving a transportation vehicle.

Secondary prediction:

This accident will involve a specific group of men; a 'team' or a group of some sort.

Prediction for end of May 2011

3719 0211

Sessions in before May 14th please to marv.darley@gmail.com.

We are attempting to predict an event in the last week of this month.

Happy viewing!

AOLing Scheduled Major News Events

I have had several of the viewers that took part here suggesting that perhaps the task here had been muddied by the blanket news coverage of the Royal wedding on Saturday, that perhaps the person responsible for choosing the eventual feedback might have been 'thinking' about the wedding etc when he/she tasked the US Tornadoes.

To clear this up:

1) Although this does constitute mild front-loading (unavoidable though, to clear this up) rest assured that I will never accept a tasking that retrospectively tasks viewers to describe an event that is pre-scheduled in any way (as the Royal wedding clearly was).

Unforeseen events may and do often occur around such events, but they will never constitute a tasking simply by virtue of their pre-planned importance.

2) Suggesting that a tasker may have had this or that 'on their mind' when tasking is a singularly bad thing to do when analysing one's session data in light of feedback. Not only does this lower one's self expectations for future sessions but it also makes a mockery of the strict protocol on which remote viewing is based.

There is ONE target; the one provided to you as feedback. Viewers should resist the urge to validate their session data by looking for other ways to 'explain' the data in their sessions.

Prediction for End of April 2011

Well the sessions are in and can be viewed (summaries and some full) here:

https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B3SWDk0vCXRpNDA0OTAxY2MtYmIxNy00M2Y2LTllNmQtMzhmZDVhYjYzZWUx&sort=name&layout=list&num=50

David has impressions of something akin to a golf game in a rural setting with a man in 'tweeds' and some buildings nearby.

Daz has a large scale event causing a 'change' and possibly movement of a large number of people. Tied up to this is notions of an important male figure.

Nascence describes a powerful person being brought 'to their knees' and taking a fall of some kind, with great loss occurring.

Lorraine has people crowded, jesting and some kind of 'lucrative' pleasure.

It is not hard to see how all of these sessions could be applied to the same target, which, at the moment, suggests that our prediction is thus:

The final week in April will see the downfall and removal of a powerful male figure from a position of wealth and influence with resultant impact on a large number of people.

With the recent uprisings in Libya, Egypt, Ivory Coast etc it isn't hard to see how this may seem like a fairly safe bet and the moment! However bear in mind that there are still three weeks to go before our target is selected, that anything can happen, (and that the person who will eventually decide the story constituting the target does not even know about the existence of this blog).

We shall wait and see what the target turns out to be, and how well our viewers have done in describing it. Check back on the last day of April for a conclusion to this trial.

Marv

We Who Knew the News

This blog has been created to track and present the work of a small of group of remote viewers attempting to describe major news events several weeks before they actually occur.

The viewers are provided a set of co-ordinates at the start of a month, and all sessions are submitted by the 10th. On the last day of that month the tasker will be informed of one news story that an independent party has decided to have been the most 'important' (eg in terms of impact, repercussive) of that past week.

A description of this event will have been the viewers' initial target. A suitable cue will be constructed, and feedback provided to the viewers.

Three weeks before all this we will have the viewers' sessions to analyse, with a consensus prediction being made and posted here on this blog.